Quisling's Quest
Navigation
« Marked for Death | Main | Twenty-first Century Heretic »
Tuesday
Jul172012

Panism

I am an independent politically. I believe in less government on the national level and more local control at a city state community level. I believe in diversity and that small government should reflect the community that lives within it. Because of all this, I see segregation, political, ethnic, religious, racial, and cultural, as a very good thing. Each community or city state should draw from different demographics. And then that local government, in its laws, traditions and education, can reflect that unique community. This would solve so many of our cultural conflicts. It would allow for true diversity of communities. My views need not be seen as racist even though I advocate segregation. I also believe that a community can chose to be multicultural and totally secular if they chose that route. My libertarian, city state vision would be an interesting experiment in freedom. Which communities would thrive? Which would deteriorate? Institutional racism would no longer be a problem because people of color could have their own communities, to design in their own fashion. I call my vision, postmodern anarchical nationalism. I am a PANist. It is post modern because it doesn't build on one paradigm or one single view of reality. It allows for each community to find its own reality and build on it. The only fundamental rule is to respect the sovereignty of all other city states and not infringe or conquer them. If there is a federal or national government, its sole purpose would be to protect the freedom of the city state. So that's Panism. Would it work? I think ultimately some form of it will have to. There is no other way to accommodate the diversity we find on this small planet.

Q.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (1)

Just recently I've heard post modernism defined in the following way. It really made sense to me. Modernism is the rebellion against religion as the main ingredient of culture, favoring reason instead. Whereas, post modernism is the rebellion against both reason and religion as the defining ingredient. It is not necessarily anti religion or anti reason, it just looks for another way. I like that. I am not anti reason, but reason alone is not the answer. There is something more that calls people. It is individual and intuitive and has a myriad of expressions. Hence the need for the City-State with a myriad of forms and flavors.

Q.

July 26, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCurious Quisling

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>